Compositions promoting the accelerated degradation of metals and composite materials

ABSTRACT

A composition to decommission firearms is presented. The composition comprises a monomer, a quantity of calcium chloride; and sulfur-containing compound. The sulfur containing compound includes sodium persulfate and/or sodium thiosulfate.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Divisional Application claiming priority from U.S.Divisional Application having Ser. No. 14/716,688, filed Ma. 19, 2015,which claimed priority from U.S. Nonprovisional Application having Ser.No. 13/138,382 filed Jul. 14, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,034,117, whichclaimed priority from U.S. Provisional Application having Ser. No.61/364,342 filed Jul. 14, 2010, all of which are incorporated herein byreference in their entirety.

GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS

This invention was made with government support under Grant NumberW31P4Q-08-C-0291 awarded by the Defense Advanced Research ProjectsAgency. The government has certain rights in the invention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to compositions that degrade and weaken metals,metal alloys, and composite materials.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The effective destruction of small arms is a growing concern,particularly for military and civilian law enforcement organizations.Small arms, such as handguns, rifles, and shotguns are routinely seizedby civilian law enforcement organizations, often as part of criminalinvestigations. In addition, military forces often encounter large enemycaches of small arms, including automatic weapons and other battlefieldarms. The continued existence of these small arms poses a continuedthreat to the extent that they may fall back into enemy or criminalhands.

In order to mitigate the risk posed by confiscated arms falling backinto unwanted hands, many military and law enforcement operations employvarious methods to incapacitate and destroy the arms to permanentlyrender them inoperable. One method of destruction involves placing thearms on a hard surface, such as a concrete road, and driving over thearms with a large vehicle. As the tires contact the arms, the weight ofthe vehicle bends and distorts the barrels of the arms. This methodgenerally works for rifles, shotguns and other long arms, but is not aseffective for handguns and other smaller arms. Also, while this methodeffectively destroys the barrel, the other parts of the weapon aregenerally undamaged. Additionally, since the barrels on many types ofarms can be easily replaced, this method is likely to leave some weaponsin operable condition. As such, the effectiveness of this method islimited.

Another method, involves plugging the barrel and other internal cavitiesof the weapon with a filler material, such as concrete, thus renderingthe weapon inoperative. The filler material, however, is generally lesssturdy as compared to the weapon itself and can be chipped or burned outto restore the functionality of the weapon. Yet another method involvesinserting and detonating an explosive in the barrel of the weapon. Theexplosion splits and distorts the barrel, rendering the weaponinoperative. As mentioned above, however, the barrel on many arms can beeasily replaced, thereby restoring the weapon's functionality.Additionally, this method is very time intensive, because it must beapplied to each weapon individually. It is also dangerous, as isgenerally the case when dealing with explosives. Other methods involvecutting, sawing, smelting, and fully encapsulating the weapons inconcrete. As such, current methods for incapacitating and destroyingsmall arms are time intensive, resource intensive, energy intensive,dangerous, or may not be permanent.

Accordingly, it would be an advance in the state of the art to provide achemical formulation, along with a method and apparatus for applyingsuch formulation, wherein the formulation is (i) non-toxic, (ii) madefrom inexpensive, non-toxic, and readily available components, (iii)capable of being easily applied to a cache of small arms or other typesof metal, (iv) capable of rendering small arms inoperable afterapplication, (v) capable of degrading metal within a short time frame soas to permanently render small arms inoperable or otherwise structurallyweaken metal such that it will likely fail when used for its intendedpurpose, and/or (vi) capable of hardening into a resin that can maintainits structural integrity at temperatures exceeding that with wouldsubstantially diminish the integrity of metal.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A composition to decommission firearms is presented. The compositioncomprises a monomer, a quantity of calcium chloride; andsulfur-containing compound. The sulfur containing compound includessodium persulfate and/or sodium thiosulfate, and combinations thereof.

In addition, a foaming composition to render electrical componentsinoperable is presented. The composition comprises a foaming agent, acorrosion promoter; and a quantity of sodium persulfate.

In addition, a method of making a composition to decommission firearmsis presented. The method combines a monomer, a quantity of calciumchloride, and a sulfur-containing compound. The sulfur-containingcompound includes sodium persulfate and/or sodium thiosulfate. Thesulfur-containing compound catalyzes the polymerization of said monomer.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a strain plot for steel samples treated for 24 hours with oneembodiment of Applicant's sprayable disarmament resin;

FIG. 2 is a strain plot for steel samples treated for 72 hours with oneembodiment of Applicant's sprayable disarmament resin;

FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b) are bar graphs showing the tensile strengthreduction for steel samples after being treated for 24 or 72 hours withtwo embodiments of Applicant's sprayable disarmament resin;

FIG. 4 contains photographs of steel samples treated with one embodimentof Applicant's sprayable disarmament resin and photographs of untreatedcontrol samples;

FIGS. 5(a) and 5(b) are strain plots for Cosmoline-coated steel samplestreated with one embodiment of Applicant's sprayable disarmament resinfor 72 hours;

FIGS. 6(a) and 6(b) are bar graphs showing the reduction in tensilestrength and elongation-to-break for Cosmoline-coated steel samplesafter being treated for 24 or 72 hours with two embodiments ofApplicant's sprayable disarmament resin;

FIG. 7 contains photographs of Cosmoline-coated steel samples treatedwith one embodiment of Applicant's sprayable disarmament resin for 72hours and photographs of untreated control samples;

FIG. 8 contains photographs of Cosmoline-coated steel samples treatedwith one embodiment of Applicant's sprayable disarmament resin for 144hours and photographs of untreated control samples;

FIG. 9 is a strain plot for steel samples treated with one embodiment ofApplicant's dispensable disarmament resin for 72 hours;

FIG. 10 contains photographs of steel samples treated with oneembodiment of Applicant's dispensable disarmament resin for 72 hours andphotographs of untreated control samples;

FIG. 11 contains a photograph of copper wires treated with oneembodiment of Applicant's dispensable sprayable resin and a photographof untreated copper wires;

FIG. 12 is a drawing depicting one embodiment of a system to dispenseApplicant's disarmament resin;

FIG. 13 is a drawing depicting one embodiment of a system to dispenseApplicant's foamable disarmament resin;

FIG. 14 is a flowchart depicting an exemplary method to create and useApplicant's disarmament resin;

FIGS. 15 and 16 show the chemistry involved in creating themelamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensate product used in certainembodiments of Applicant's disarmament resin;

FIG. 17 is a pneumatic/hydraulic schematic for one embodiment of ansystem for applying Applicant's disarmament resin;

FIG. 18 is an electrical schematic to be used with the applicator inFIG. 17;

FIG. 19 is a pneumatic/hydraulic schematic for another embodiment of ansystem for applying Applicant's disarmament resin; and

FIG. 20 is an electrical schematic to be used with the applicator inFIG. 19.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In one embodiment, Applicant's composition comprises a non-toxicchemical formulation for a more convenient, safe, and permanent means ofweakening and destroying metal (both ferrous and non-ferrous) andcomposite materials than those that currently exist. Applicant'scomposition, in different embodiments, is available as a sprayableliquid, a dispensable paste, and a foamable, formulation. In certainembodiments, Applicant's composition comprises two components, whichcure within a few minutes after mixing to form a tough, rigid thermosetresin. In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises twocomponents, which cure within a few minutes after mixing to form aflexible resin.

In one embodiment of Applicant's method, Applicant's composition is usedfor incapacitation and destruction of caches of small arms. Using thedispensable embodiment, a thermoset polymer immediately cements andbinds firearm barrels and actions, as well as corroding and embrittlingmetal surfaces to significantly reduce the strength and ductility of themetal. Applicant's composition is able to penetrate and effectivelydegrade firearms even if their surfaces have been pre-coated with alubricant/corrosion inhibitor, such as Cosmoline. Applicant'scomposition renders the weapons inoperable by hardening within one ormore internal cavities and/or corroding and weakening metal elements ofthe weapons.

In another embodiment of Applicant's method, Applicant's composition isapplied to one or more portions of a suspension system for a vehicle,such as and without limitation a car, truck or other military vehicle.After application, Applicant's composition corrodes and embrittles theaffected part, such as for example and without limitation a coil or leafspring thereby causing the spring to fail during use. This embodimentenables soldiers or law enforcement personal to effectively anddiscretely disable vehicles by destroying the suspension system, butwithout inflicting significant damage to the other parts of the vehicle.

In yet another embodiment of Applicant's method, Applicant's compositionis applied to electronics systems, including circuit boards, hard diskstorage devices, tape storage devices, electronic storage device, andthe like. After application, Applicant's composition corrodes andembrittles metal and/or ceramic elements of the contacted device therebyrendering the device inoperable.

Applicant's composition degrades metals and other materials via anelectrolytic pitting corrosion mechanism. In addition, in certainembodiments Applicant's composition comprises sulfurous compounds whichpromote hydrogen embrittlement within steel surfaces. Hydrogen is abyproduct of corrosion and electrochemical process in an aqueousenvironment. During an electrochemical process, hydrogen ions (H+)combine with electrons to form atomic hydrogen on the surface of amaterial, such as for example a steel surface of a firearm component.

Depending on the environment and interfacial properties, the atomichydrogen formed may recombine to form molecular hydrogen. However, inthe presence of sulfur compounds, the hydrogen recombination tomolecular hydrogen process is poisoned, and atomic hydrogen insteadrapidly permeates into the steel surface causing cracking, embrittlementand ductility loss within the metal. By virtue of its small size, atomichydrogen readily permeates through layers of gun oil, lubricants, orother corrosion prevention materials, which are commonly used to protectsteel from environmental corrosive.

In various embodiments, applicant's composition is a waterbornesprayable liquid, a dispensable gel, or a foamable liquid. In someembodiments, the composition cures to form a rigid resin uponapplication. In some embodiments, the composition cures to form aflexible resin upon application. The cured resins induce significantsurface pitting and embrittlement in treated steel leading todelamination, surface cracks, and brittle factures and causing to rapidreduction in steel tensile strength and elongation-to-break values.

In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises a monomer Ithat can be polymerized using a chain-growth mechanism to form oligomersand polymers. In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprisesone or more monomers I, wherein R1 is selected from the group consistingof —N(R3)(R4), —CO—O—R3, —CO—OH, phenyl, and benzyl, and wherein R2 isselected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, phenyl,and benzyl.

In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises one or moresubstituted acrylamide monomers II, wherein at least one of thesubstituted acrylamide monomers is water soluble.

In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid. In certain embodiments,Applicant's composition comprises 2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonicacid salt III. In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid salt III wherein M⁺ is Na⁺ orCa⁺. 2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic polymer has a conductivity of0.02-0.11 s.cm⁻¹.

In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises one or moresubstituted N-vinyl pyrrolidones IV.

In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises a2-alkyl-oxazoline V (wherein alkyl is ethyl). Using Applicant's method,monomer V is polymerized to form a plurality of substitutedpolyethyleneimine oligomers/polymers VI.

In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises across-linking agent, such as and without limitation, N, N′-methylenebis-acrylamide VII.

In certain embodiments, applicant's dispensable gel composition is anon-Newtonian fluid with a shear thinning paste rheology. This gelcomposition can be dispensed and disposed into firearms barrels andactions. The resin formed comprises a condensate between melamine VIII,glyoxal, IX, and acrylamide X. This formulation polymerizes to a veryhard thermoset product exhibiting high compressive strength. Thisformulation is well suited for plugging the firing action and barrels ofseized small arms.

The following Examples are presented to further illustrate to personsskilled in the art how to make and use the invention. These Examples arenot intended as a limitation, however, upon the scope of Applicant'sinvention.

EXAMPLE 1

In one embodiment, Applicant's composition having an about 64/1 weightpercentage ratio monomer/cross-linking agent is prepared using thecomponents in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Concentration Part Component Function (wt %) A Monomer III,Resin Monomer 14.13 Sodium Salt N-N′ Resin Crosslinking 0.22methylenebisacrylamide Agent CaCl₂ Corrosion/Pitting 8.26 (CalciumChloride) Promoter Na₂S₂O₃ Redox Free Radical 3.59 (Sodium Thiosulfate)Promoter, Corrosion/Hydrogen Embrittlement Promoter B Na₂S₂O₈ FreeRadical 5.22 (Sodium Persulfate) Polymerization agent- Resin GelationInitiator, Corrosion Promoter — H₂O Resin Solvent 68.58 (water) TOTAL100.00

Part A is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a portion of thewater, 2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid/sodium salt monomer(sold in commerce by Lubrizol as AMPS-2405), N-N′ methylenebisacrylamidecrosslinking agent (sold in commerce by Alfa Aesar), calcium chlorideprills (sold in commerce by Hill Brothers Chemical Co.), and anhydroussodium thiosulfate (photo grade quality sold in commerce by CCI).

Part B is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a portion of thewater with sodium persulfate (sold in commerce by FMC IndustrialChemicals).

Just prior to application, the Part A and Part B components are combinedto form a low viscosity liquid (less than 20 cP), which is broadcastonto a target cache of weapons, vehicle suspension system, electroniccircuitry, or other suitable target. The liquid will cure to a flexibleresin within a short period of time.

EXAMPLE 2

In one embodiment, Applicant's composition having an about 33/1 weightpercentage ratio monomer/cross-linking agent is prepared using thecomponents in Table 2. This embodiment results in a flexible resin whencured. The resin of Example 2 is somewhat softer than the resin ofExample 1 due to higher ratio of monomer/cross-linker in the Example 1formulation.

TABLE 2 Concentration Part Component Function (wt %) A Monomer III,Sodium Resin Monomer 8.24 Salt N-N′ Resin Crosslinking 0.25methylenebisacrylamide Agent CaCl₂ Corrosion/Pitting 15.12 PromoterNa₂S₂O₃ Redox Free Radical 4.53 (Sodium Thiosulfate) Promoter,Corrosion/Hydrogen Embrittlement Promoter B Na₂S₂O₈ Free Radical 6.52(Sodium Persulfate) Polymerization agent- Resin Gelation Initiator,Corrosion Promoter — H₂O Resin Solvent 65.34 (water) TOTAL 100.00

Part A is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a portion of thewater, the 2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid/sodium saltmonomer (sold in commerce by Lubrizol as AMPS-2405), the N-N′methylenebisacrylamide crosslinking agent (sold in commerce by AlfaAesar), calcium chloride prills (sold in commerce by Hill BrothersChemical Co.), and the anhydrous sodium thiosulfate (photo grade qualitysold in commerce by CCI).

Part B is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a portion of thewater with sodium persulfate (sold in commerce by FMC IndustrialChemicals).

Just prior to application, the Part A and Part B components are combinedto form a low viscosity liquid (less than 20 cP), which is broadcastonto a target cache of weapons, vehicle suspension system, electroniccircuitry, or other suitable target. The liquid will cure to a flexibleresin within a short period of time.

EXAMPLE 3

In one embodiment, Applicant's dispensable gel disarmament resincomposition is prepared using the components in Table 3. This embodimentresults in a rigid resin when cured.

TABLE 3 Concentration Part Component Function (wt %) A Melamine VIII-Resin Oligomer 19.70 glyoxal IX- acrylamide X Condensate Product CaCl₂Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 6.42 Na₂S₂O₃ Redox Free Radical 4.93 (SodiumPromoter, Thiosulfate) Corrosion/Hydrogen Embrittlement Promoter BNa₂S₂O₈ Free Radical Polymerization 9.13 (Sodium agent - Resin GelationPersulfate) Initiator, Corrosion Promoter — H₂O Resin Solvent 59.82(water) TOTAL 100.00

The melamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensation product is synthesized from322.14 g of glyoxal (40%), sold in commerce by Alfa Aeser, weighed intoa 1000 mL polyethylene bottle with large stir bar and then about 85% ofthe total water amount (144.88*0.85=123.12 g) is added into the bottle.The glyoxal solution is heated to 40° C. Approximately 4-5 g ofmelamine, sold in commerce by Sigma-Aldrich, is added into the glyoxalsolution every two minutes over a period of 20 minutes. The final amountof melamine in the solution is 50.00 g. The reaction is allowed toproceed for 3 hours at 40° C. Referring to FIG. 15, the reaction betweenmelamine 1502 and glyoxal 1504 to form product 1506. Themelamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensation product is then copolymerizedwith 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid salt via radical chainpolymerization to form a highly crosslinked polymer.

Next, 263.01 g of 60% acrylamide solution, sold in commerce by AlfaAesar, is added to the reaction mixture while stirring. The pH is thenadjusted to 8.00 using 10% sodium carbonate solution. The reaction isallowed to proceed for another 2 hours at 40° C., then the pH isadjusted to pH 7.5 if necessary using 10% sodium carbonate solution.Referring to FIG. 16, the reaction between the melamine/glyoxal product1602 and acrylamide 1604 to form the condensate product 1606.

The remaining 15% of the total water amount is then added into thereaction. Finally, the heat is removed and the solution stirred foranother 4-5 days. The solid content, from such preparedmelamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensate solution, will be approximately43.2% weight percent.

Part A is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a portion of thewater, the melamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensation product, calciumchloride prills and the sodium thiosulfate.

Part B is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a portion of thewater with sodium persulfate.

Just prior to application, the Part A and Part B components are combinedto form gel, which is applied onto a target cache of weapons, vehiclesuspension system, electronic circuitry, or other suitable target. Thegel will cure to a rigid resin within a short period of time.

In some embodiments, the quantity of the melamine-glyoxal-acrylamidecondensation product is between about 40 dry weight percent and about 60dry weight percent of the combined Part A and Part B components in Table3. In some embodiments, the quantity of sodium chloride is between about10 dry weight percent and about 20 dry weight percent of the combinedPart A and Part B components in Table 3. In some embodiments, thequantity of the sodium thiosulfate is between about 5 dry weight percentand about 15 dry weight percent of the combined Part A and Part Bcomponents in Table 3. In some embodiments, the quantity of the sodiumpersulfate is between about 20 dry weight percent and about 30 weightpercent of the combined Part A and Part B components in Table 3. In someembodiments, the total quantity of water used to create the aqueous PartA component and the aqueous Part B component is between about 50 weightpercent and about 75 weight percent of the total components in Table 3.

EXAMPLE 4

In one embodiment, Applicant's dispensable liquid disarmament resincomposition is prepared using the components in Table 4. This embodimentresults in a rigid resin when cured.

TABLE 4 Concentration Part Component Function (wt %) A Melamine VIII-Resin Oligomer 9.45 glyoxal IX- acrylamide X Condensate Product MonomerIII, Resin Co-monomer 5.50 Sodium Salt CaCl₂ Corrosion/Pitting Promoter13.56 Na₂S₂O₃ Redox Free Radical 4.53 (Sodium Promoter, Thiosulfate)Corrosion/Hydrogen Embrittlement Promoter B Na₂S₂O₈ Free RadicalPolymerization 6.53 (Sodium agent - Resin Gelation Persulfate)Initiator, Corrosion Promoter — H₂O Resin Solvent 60.43 (water) TOTAL100.00

The melamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensation product is synthesized inthe same manner as in Example 3 above.

Part A is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a portion of thewater, the melamine-glyoxal-acrylamide condensation product, the2-Acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid/sodium salt monomer, calciumchloride prills and the sodium thiosulfate.

Part B is an aqueous solution prepared by combining a portion of thewater with sodium persulfate.

Just prior to application, the Part A and Part B components are combinedto form a low viscosity liquid (less than 20 cP), which is broadcastonto a target cache of weapons, vehicle suspension system, electroniccircuitry, or other suitable target. The liquid will cure to a rigidresin within a short period of time.

Other Embodiments

In different embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises copper orgraphite powder to further promote corrosion induced by galvanic current(i.e., a galvanic current enhancer). In different embodiments, thecopper powder is grade 161 or 301-E, sold in commerce by ACuPowder. Inone embodiment, the graphite powder is grade A60 synthetic graphite,sold in commerce by Asbury Carbons. In different embodiments,Applicant's composition comprises less than 1 weight percent copper orgraphite powder, between about 1 weight percent and about 2 weightpercent copper or graphite powder, between about 2 weight percent andabout 5 weight percent copper or graphite powder, or greater than about5 weight percent.

In certain embodiments, the formulations in Examples 1-4 utilizeammonium persulfate and/or potassium persulfate in place of sodiumpersulfate. In these embodiments, the amounts of sodiumpersulfate/ammonium persulfate/potassium persulfate are adjusted to givethe same molar equivalents of total persulfate as recited in Tables 1-4,respectively.

In certain embodiments, the Part A mixture of Examples 1-4 is preparedwithout water (i.e., only the dry components are combined) and the PartB component of Examples 1-4 is also prepared without water. The dry andlight weight Part A and Part B components can be easily shipped orotherwise transported as necessary. Water is then added on-site to formthe aqueous Part A and Part B components. In one embodiment, 25 mL ofwater is added to the dry Part A mixture to form the aqueous Part Acomponent and 43 mL of water is added to the dry Part B component toform the aqueous Part B component. Just prior to application, theaqueous Part A component and aqueous Part B component are mixedtogether, and the mixture broadcast onto a target cache of weapons,vehicle suspension system, electronic circuitry, and the like.

The mixing may occur in an applicator device. In one embodiment of theapplicator, the applicator contains a chamber for the Part A componentand a separate chamber for the Part B component. Liquid streams of thePart A and Part B components are forced together in a manner to allowsufficient mixing before exiting the device.

The only regulated component of Tables 1-4 is sodium persulfate(Na₂S₂O₈), which is regulated by the US Department of Transportation fortransportation. The embodiments in Examples 1-4 do not contain anyacidic components. Acid is instead generated in-situ viasteel/persulfate corrosion reactions.

Test Results

Test samples comprising 4130 steel wire rod, cut into 4 inch lengthswith a prepared gauge length of 1.25 inches including a diminisheddiameter cross-section in the center of the rod were used to evaluatethe formulations of Tables 1 and 2. The prepared gauge lengthdiminished/reduced diameter section has a diameter of 0.06 (+/−0.001)inches and is produced by rotational milling of the rod at approx. 3000rpm with 200 grit Emery Cloth and finished with a 440 grit siliconcarbide abrasive (as per ASTM E 8/E 8M -08, Standard Test Methods forTension Testing of Metallic Materials). The surface area to volume ratio(S/V) of the 4140 wire is 67 inches⁻¹.

The formulations of Example 1-4 were applied to 4130 steel wire rod. Thetreated specimens were then allowed to age for 3-5 days. Stress/straintests were then preformed on test specimens and controls.

Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, two representative stress-strain plots for4340 steel rods after being treated with the Example 2 formulation areshown. FIG. 1 depicts a strain plot 200 for a steel sample treated withExample 2 formulation and aged for 24 hours (1 day). The vertical axis202 represents the force applied to the sample. The horizontal axis 204represents time. The stress-strain curve 206 represents the controlsample, which was not treated with the Example 2 formulation. Thestress-strain curve 208 represents the sample treated with the Example 2formulation for 24 hours.

The control sample and treated sample were exposed tosteadily-increasing force. The stress-strain curves 206 and 208 showsteadily increasing force over time at 210. The yield point of eachsample is reached at 212 where each stress-strain curve 206 and 208begin to flatten as the samples begin to deform. The break point of eachsample is reached at 214 and 216 where the samples fail under theapplied force.

The treated sample, represented by curve 208, showed a reduced yieldpoint and break point compared to the control sample, represented bycurve 206.

FIG. 2 depicts a strain plot 220 for a steel sample treated with curedTable 2 formulation for 72 hours (3 days). The vertical axis 222represents the force applied to the sample. The horizontal axis 224represents time. The stress-strain curve 226 represents the controlsample, which was not treated with the Example 2 formulation. Thestress-strain curve 228 represents the sample treated with the Example 2formulation for 72 hours.

The control sample and treated sample were exposed tosteadily-increasing force. The stress-strain curves 226 and 228 showsteadily increasing force over time at 230. The yield point of eachsample is reached at 232 and 234 where each stress-strain curve 226 and228 begin to flatten as the samples begin to deform. The break point ofeach sample is reached at 236 and 238 where the samples fail under theapplied force.

The treated sample, represented by curve 228, showed a significantreduction in both yield point and break point compared to the controlsample, represented by curve 226.

Referring to FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b), two representative bar graphs areshown depicting the reduction in tensile strength and elongation forsteel samples treated with the Table 1 formulation and the Example 2formulation. FIG. 3(a) shows a bar graph 300 depicting the tensilestrength reduction for steel samples after being treated for 1 or 3 dayswith either the Table 1 formulation or the Example 2 formulation. Thevertical axis 302 represents the percent reduction in tensile strengthover control samples that have not been treated with either formulation.

Bar 304 represents a sample treated with the Table 1 formulation for 24hours (1 day). Bar 306 represents a sample treated with the Table 1formulation for 72 hours (3 day). Bar 308 represents a sample treatedwith the Example 2 formulation for 24 hours (1 day). Bar 310 representsa sample treated with the Example 2 formulation for 72 hours (3 day).Increase treatment time results in a reduction in tensile strength forboth formulations. Additionally, the samples treated with the AMP-5formulation 120, represented by 304 and 306, show increased reduction intensile strength as compared to the sample treated with the Table 1formulation, represented by bars 308 and 310. In general, the reductionin tensile strength indicates the damage caused by corrosion.

FIG. 3(b) shows a bar graph 320 depicting the elongation-to-breakreduction for steel samples after being treated for 1 or 3 days witheither the Table 1 formulation or the Example 2 formulation.Elongation-to-break is the distance a sample will elongate (i.e.stretch) until it fails (i.e. breaks). The vertical axis 302 representsthe percent reduction in elongation-to-break over control samples thathave not been treated with either formulation.

Bar 324 represents a sample treated with the Table 1 formulation for 24hours (1 day). Bar 326 represents a sample treated with the Table 1formulation for 72 hours (3 day).

Bar 328 represents a sample treated with the Example 2 formulation for24 hours (1 day). Bar 330 represents a sample treated with the Example 2formulation for 72 hours (3 day). Increase treatment time results in areduction in elongation-to-break for both formulations. Additionally,the samples treated with the Example 2 formulation, represented by bars324 and 326, show increased reduction in elongation-to-break as comparedto the sample treated with the Table 1 formulation, represented by bars328 and 330. In general, the reduction in elongation-to-break indicatesthe damage resulted from hydrogen embrittlement.

Referring to FIG. 4, photographs of steel samples treated with theExample 2 formulation and untreated control samples are shown.Photograph 400 shows an untreated control sample. Photograph 402 shows asample after being treated with the Example 2 formulation for 24 hours(1 day). Photograph 404 shows a magnified view of the untreated controlsample in photograph 400. Photograph 406 shows a magnified view of thesample treated with the Example 2 formulation for 24 hours in photograph402.

Photograph 408 shows the untreated control sample after being exposed tosufficient force to reach the break point. The sample in photograph 408shows normal elongation and necking. The normal “cup and cone” failurecan be seen at the break point 410.

Photograph 412 shows the sample treated with the Example 2 formulationfor 24 hours after being exposed to sufficient force to reach the breakpoint. The sample in photograph 412 shows a non-symmetrical break at thebreak point 414.

Small arms in the field are often lubricated with Cosmoline to protectthem from corrosion. Cosmoline is a trade name for a class of rustpreventatives substances that is frequently applied to firearms toinhibit rust. Cosmoline is a homogeneous mixture of oily and waxylong-chain, non-polar hydrocarbons. A suitable disarmament resinformulations should be able to penetrate through the Cosmoline layer andreadily degrade the underlying steel firearm surfaces.

Steel samples were treated with a Cosmoline layer having a thickness of10 mils (1 inch=1000 mils). The Cosmoline layer thickness recommended bythe manufacturers for corrosion protection is 1.5 mils. The Cosmolinelayer applied to the samples, therefore, was well in excess of themanufacturer's recommendation thickness.

Referring to FIG. 5, two representative stress-strain plots for 4340steel rods after being treated with cured Example 2 formulation areshown. FIG. 5(a) depicts a strain plot 500 for a steel sample treatedwith cured Example 2 formulation for 72 hours (3 days). The verticalaxis 502 represents the force applied to the sample. The horizontal axis504 represents time. The stress-strain curve 506 represents the controlsample, which was not treated with the Example 2 formulation. Thestress-strain curve 508 represents the sample treated with the Example 2formulation for 72 hours.

The control sample and treated sample were exposed tosteadily-increasing force. The stress-strain curves 506 and 508 showsteadily increasing force over time at 510. The yield point of eachsample is reached at 512 where each stress-strain curve 506 and 508begin to flatten as the samples begin to deform. The break point of eachsample is reached at 514 and 516 where the samples fail under theapplied force.

Despite the presence of the 10-mil thick Cosmoline layer, the treatedsample, represented by curve 508, showed a reduced yield point and asignificant reduction in break point compared to the control sample,represented by curve 506.

FIG. 5(b) depicts a strain plot 520 for a steel sample treated withcured Example 2 formulation for 144 hours (6 days). The vertical axis522 represents the force applied to the sample. The horizontal axis 524represents time. The stress-strain curve 526 represents the controlsample, which was not treated with the Example 2 formulation. Thestress-strain curve 528 represents the sample treated with the Example 2formulation for 144 hours.

The control sample and treated sample were exposed tosteadily-increasing force. The stress-strain curves 526 and 528 showsteadily increasing force over time at 530. The yield point of eachsample is reached at 532 where each stress-strain curve 526 and 528begin to flatten as the samples begin to deform. The break point of eachsample is reached at 534 and 536 where the samples fail under theapplied force.

Despite the presence of the 10-mil thick Cosmoline layer, the treatedsample, represented by curve 528, showed a considerable reduction inboth yield point and break point compared to the control sample,represented by curve 226.

Referring to FIG. 6, two representative bar graphs are shown depictingthe reduction in tensile strength and elongation for steel samplescoated with a Cosmoline layer of varying thicknesses (1.5 mil, 5 mil,and 10 mil) and treated with the Example 2 formulation. FIG. 6(a) showsa bar graph 600 depicting the tensile strength reduction for steelsamples having a Cosmoline layer of 1.5 mils, 5 mils, or 10 mils andafter being treated for 72 hours or 144 hours (3 or 6 days) with theExample 2 formulation. The vertical axis 602 represents the percentreduction in tensile strength over control samples that have not beentreated with either formulation.

1.5 mil Cosmoline Coating. Bar 604 represents a sample coated with a 1.5mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example 2 formulationfor 72 hours (3 days). Bar 606 represents a sample coated with a 1.5 millayer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example 2 formulation for144 hours (6 days).

5 mil Cosmoline Coating. Bar 608 represents a sample coated with a 5 millayer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example 2 formulation for72 hours (3 days). Bar 610 represents a sample coated with a 5 mil layerof Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example 2 formulation for 144hours (6 days).

10 mil Cosmoline Coating. Bar 612 represents a sample coated with a 10mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example 2 formulationfor 72 hours (3 days). Bar 614 represents a sample coated with a 10 millayer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example 2 formulation for144 hours (6 days).

FIG. 6(b) shows a bar graph 620 depicting the elongation-to-breakreduction for steel samples having a Cosmoline layer of 1.5 mils, 5mils, or 10 mils and after being treated for 72 hours or 144 hours (3 or6 days) with the Example 2 formulation. The vertical axis 622 representsthe percent reduction in elongation-to-break over control samples thathave not been treated with either formulation.

1.5 mil Cosmoline Coating. Bar 624 represents a sample coated with a 1.5mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example 2 formulationfor 72 hours (3 days). Bar 626 represents a sample coated with a 1.5 millayer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example 2 formulation for144 hours (6 days).

5 mil Cosmoline Coating. Bar 628 represents a sample coated with a 5 millayer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example 2 formulation for72 hours (3 days). Bar 630 represents a sample coated with a 5 mil layerof Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example 2 formulation for 144hours (6 days).

10 mil Cosmoline Coating. Bar 632 represents a sample coated with a 10mil layer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example 2 formulationfor 72 hours (3 days). Bar 634 represents a sample coated with a 10 millayer of Cosmoline layer and treated with the Example 2 formulation for144 hours (6 days).

Compared to the samples that were not coated with Cosmoline, FIGS. 3(a)and 3(b), the rate by which the steel corroded and became hydrogenembrittled, as shown in FIGS. 6(a) and 6(b), decreased as the Cosmolinethickness increased. All Cosmoline samples treated with the Example 2formulation, however, were ultimately degraded as a result of thetreatment.

Referring to FIG. 7, photographs of steel samples with a 10 milCosmoline coating are shown. Photographs 700, 704, and 708 arephotographs of untreated control samples. Photographs 702, 706, and 712are photographs of samples treated with the Example 2 formulation for 72hours (3 days).

Photograph 700 shows an untreated control sample. Photograph 702 shows asample coated with a 10 mil Cosmoline layer after being treated with theExample 2 formulation for 72 hours (3 days). Photograph 704 shows amagnified view of the untreated control sample in photograph 700.Photograph 706 shows a magnified view of the sample coated with a 10 milCosmoline layer after being treated with the Example 2 formulation for72 hours in photograph 702.

Photograph 708 shows the untreated control sample after being exposed tosufficient force to reach the break point. The sample in photograph 708shows normal elongation and necking. The normal “cup and cone” formationcan be seen at the break point 710.

Photograph 712 shows the sample coated with a 10 mil Cosmoline layerafter being treated with the Example 2 formulation for 72 hours andafter being exposed to sufficient force to reach the break point. Thesample in photograph 712 shows a non-symmetrical break at the breakpoint 714.

Referring to FIG. 8, photographs of steel samples with a 10 milCosmoline coating are shown. Photographs 800, 804, and 808 arephotographs of untreated control samples. Photographs 802, 806, and 812are photographs of samples treated with the Example 2 formulation for144 hours (6 days).

Photograph 800 shows an untreated control sample. Photograph 802 shows asample after being treated with the Example 2 formulation for 144 hours(6 days). Photograph 804 shows a magnified view of the untreated controlsample in photograph 800. Photograph 806 shows a magnified view of thesample treated with the Example 2 formulation for 144 hours inphotograph 802.

Photograph 808 shows the untreated control sample after being exposed tosufficient force to reach the break point. The sample in photograph 808shows normal elongation and necking. The normal “cup and cone” failurecan be seen at the break point 810.

Photograph 812 shows the sample coated with a 10 mil Cosmoline layerafter being treated with the Example 2 formulation for 144 hours andafter being exposed to sufficient force to reach the break point. Thesample in photograph 812 shows a non-symmetrical break at the breakpoint 814.

Significant pitting can be observed in the resin treated specimen asshown in photographs 702, 706, 712 (72 hour treatment) and 802, 806, 812(144 hour exposure). In comparison, there was no pitting observed in theCosmoline treated control specimens, as shown in the photographs 700,704, 708 and 800, 804, 808. This shows that the cured Example 2formulation was able to permeate through the Cosmoline and inducelocalized pitting corrosion within the steel specimens.

FIG. 9 depicts a strain plot 900 for a steel sample treated with Table 3formulation for 72 hours (3 days). The vertical axis 902 represents theforce applied to the sample. The horizontal axis 904 represents time.The stress-strain curve 906 represents the control sample, which was nottreated with the Table 3 formulation. The stress-strain curve 908represents the sample treated with the Table 3 formulation for 72 hours.

The control sample and treated sample were exposed tosteadily-increasing force. The stress-strain curves 906 and 908 showsteadily increasing force over time at 910. The yield point of eachsample is reached at 912 where each stress-strain curve 906 and 908begin to flatten as the samples begin to deform. The break point of eachsample is reached at 914 and 916 where the samples fail under theapplied force.

The treated sample, represented by curve 908, showed a reduced breakpoint compared to the control sample, represented by curve 906. Theaverage tensile strength reduction is 6.6% for resin treated steelversus control, while its reduction in elongation-to-break is 54%.

Referring to FIG. 10, photographs of steel samples treated with theTable 3 formulation and an untreated control samples are shown.Photograph 1000 shows an untreated control sample. Photograph 1002 showsa sample after being treated with the Table 3 formulation for 72 hours(3 days). Photograph 1004 shows a magnified view of the untreatedcontrol sample in photograph 1000. Photograph 1006 shows a magnifiedview of the sample treated with the Table 3 formulation for 72 hours inphotograph 1002.

Photograph 1008 shows the untreated control sample after being exposedto sufficient force to reach the break point. The sample in photograph1008 shows normal elongation and necking. The normal “cup and cone”failure can be seen at the break point 1010.

Photograph 1012 shows the sample treated with the Table 3 formulationfor 72 hours after being exposed to sufficient force to reach the breakpoint. The sample in photograph 1012 shows a non-symmetrical break atthe break point 1014.

Equivalent structural tests were also performed on SAE 1020 gradethreaded steel rods, SAE 1025 grade threaded steel rods, SAE 1045 gradetempered steel rods, SAE 4140 grade tempered steel rods, AK-47 RifleBarrel Sections, and AK-47 springs, all with similar results.Applicant's composition also proved to be effective in degrading metalcoated with a chrome layer, as is the case with the interior surface ofAK-47 and other firearm barrels.

Corrosive Foam Embodiments

Applicant's composition is also useful to corrode and otherwise renderinoperable electronics systems, including circuit boards, and othersystems containing exposed wires or other microelectronics. The curedresin of Applicant's composition is highly conductive, with a measuredconductivity value of 7500 μS.cm⁻¹, which is approximately twice asconductive as a 2000 ppm solution of NaCl in water (3860 μS.cm⁻¹). Inaddition, the resin has been shown to be effective in degrading thecopper and other conductive components of the electronic device.

Referring to FIG. 11, a photograph 1100 of copper wires treated with theExample 2 formulation and an untreated control sample is shown. Twocopper wires 1102 and 1104 are shown in a container 1106. No othermaterial is added to the container 1108. The resistance between copperwire 1102 and copper wire 1104, measured with a digital multimeter,shows no electrical connection (i.e. infinite resistance between thewires).

Two copper wires 1110 and 1112 are shown in a second container 1114. TheExample 2 formulation was added to the container 1114 as shown at 1116.The resistance between the copper wire 1102 and copper wire 1104,measured with a digital multimeter, showed a resistance of ˜200 Ω. Thisresistance value equates to a conductivity value of 7500 μS.cm⁻¹,approximately twice as conductive as a 2000 ppm solution of NaCl inwater (3860 μS.cm⁻¹). Additionally, the corrosion of the copper wire isindicated by the darkened areas surrounding the portion of each wire1110 and 1112 covered by the Example 2 formulation. The corrosion areafor wire 1112 is indicated at 1118.

As such, two degradation modes exist for the Applicant's compositionwhen applied to electrical circuitry. Applicant's composition corrodesany exposed metal and composite materials. Applicant's composition alsoforms low resistance electrical connections between all exposedelectrically active portions of the circuit, rendering the circuitinstantly inoperative. In addition, the cured resin, resulting fromapplication of Applicant's composition, encases the circuit in a tough,intractable thermoset polymer that cannot be easily removed. As theresin cures, the resistance between copper wires 1110 and 1112 willincrease over time due to loss of water and the build up of corrosivematerial. By that point, however, significant corrosion of theelectrically active circuit components is expected to further render thecircuit inoperative.

Tables 5 through 8 recite foamable embodiments of Applicant'scomposition. In certain embodiments, Applicant's foamable compositioncomprises Cocamidopropyl betaine (CAB) XI

TABLE 5 Concentra- Part Component Function tion (wt %) A NaClCorrosion/Pitting Promoter 8.4 Methyldiethanolamine Corrosion/pittingPromoter, 8.14 Stress Corrosion Cracking Promoter Cocamidopropyl FoamingAgent 6.56 betaine B Na₂S₂O₈ Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 15.59 (SodiumPersulfate) — H₂O Solvent 61.31 (water) TOTAL 100.00

TABLE 6 Concentra- Part Component Function tion (wt %) A CaCl₂Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 8.79 Methyldiethanolamine Corrosion/pittingPromoter, 7.92 Stress Corrosion Cracking Promoter Surfactant FoamingAgent 9.07 B Na₂S₂O₈ Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 15.17 (SodiumPersulfate) — H₂O Solvent 59.05 (water) TOTAL 100.00

Stable, thick foams (maintaining height >1 day) were produced from thecompositions of Table 6, wherein the Surfactant is selected from thegroup consisting of SCHERCOTAIN SCAB-50 Betaine Amphoteric (INCI Name:Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine, Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio),CHEMBETAIN CAS (INCI Name: Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine, LubrizolCorporation, Wickliffe, Ohio), and CHEMBETAINE LHS (INCI Name: LaurylHydroxy Sultaine, Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio).

TABLE 7 Concentration Part Component Function (wt %) A CaCl₂Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 6.96 Na₂S₂O₃ Corrosion/pitting Promoter, 8.35(Sodium Stress Corrosion Cracking Thiosulfate) Promoter SurfactantFoaming Agent 8.91 B Na₂S₂O₈ Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 12.02 (SodiumPersulfate) — H₂O Solvent 63.76 (water) TOTAL 100.00

The formulation of Table 7 gives a stable foam comprising a lowerdensity than the foams of Table 6. The foams of Table 7 utilized aSurfactant selected from the group consisting of SCHERCOTAIN SCAB-50Betaine Amphoteric (INCI Name: Cocamidopropyl Hydroxysultaine, LubrizolCorporation, Wickliffe, Ohio), CHEMBETAIN CAS (INCI Name: CocamidopropylHydroxysultaine, Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, Ohio), and CHEMBETAINELHS (INCI Name: Lauryl Hydroxy Sultaine, Lubrizol Corporation,Wickliffe, Ohio).

TABLE 8 Concentration Part Component Function (wt %) A NaClCorrosion/Pitting Promoter 8.17 Methyldiethanol Corrosion/pittingPromoter, 7.92 amine Stress Corrosion, Cracking Promoter SurfactantFoaming Agent 9.07 B Na₂S₂O₈ Corrosion/Pitting Promoter 15.17 (SodiumPersulfate) — H₂O Solvent 59.67 (water) TOTAL 100.00

The formulation of Table 8 gives a thick foam, wherein the Surfactantcomprises CHEMOXIDE CAW (INCI Name: Cocamidopropylamine Oxide, LubrizolCorporation Wickliffe, Ohio).

In certain embodiments, Applicant's composition comprises Monomer IIIand N, N′-methylene bis-acrylamide, compound VII, in the amounts ofTable 1 or Example 2, in combination with the formulations of Tables 5,6, 7, or 8. The resulting foam shows enhanced stabilization with respectto drainage and settling.

The Table 5, 6, 7, and 8, formulations produce a foam when agitated oraerated, such as with a aeration nozzle. In one embodiment, when appliedto a circuit or other electrical equipment, the foam corrodes exposedmetal circuitry and electrically connects all circuits that it contacts,thereby shorting the circuit. Application of a Table 5, 6, 7, and/or 8,formulation thereby renders the circuit inoperable by initiallyelectrically shorting the circuit and, over time, corroding the metalportions of the circuit.

In certain embodiments, a Table 5, 6, 7, and/or 8, formulation can beprepared by combining the first four listed components in powdered form.When deployed, the final component, water, is added to the mixture,aerated to create a foam, and applied to the target. A suitableapplicator, such as described in FIG. 12, may be used to hydrate,aerate, and dispense the Table 5 formulation on the target.

The methyldiethanol amine component recited in Tables 5, 6, 7, and 8,can be replaced using a substitute amine selected from the groupconsisting of hexamethylenetetramine, ethanolamine, diethanolamine,triethanolamine, monoisopropanolamine, diisopropanolamine,triisopropanolamine, polyethyleneimine, Bis-(hydroxyethyl) methylamine,and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol. The substituted amine replacesmethyldiethanol amine in equivalent molar quantities.

Applicant's composition can be transported in the form of two dry andrelatively safe precursor components in powder form. In one embodiment,an applicator device for either the sprayable embodiment or thedispensable gel embodiment may contain three chambers: a first chamberfor holding the first hydrated precursor, a second chamber for holdingthe second hydrated precursor, and a third chamber for allowing thefirst and second precursors to combine and mix, thereby commencing thepolymerization reaction. The powdered precursor may be hydrated beforebeing added to the applicator device, or alternately, may be hydrateddirectly in their respective chambers in the device. A pumping means isadded to the application device to drive the hydrated subcomponents intothe mixing chamber. The pumping means also drives the combined hydratedprecursor mixture out through a spray head (for the sprayableembodiment) or a nozzle (for the dispensable gel embodiment) and ontothe target. In another embodiment, the hydrated precursors are mixedmanually in a container and applied to the target with a brush or pouredover the target.

Referring to FIG. 12, a Part A component of a sprayable formulation,such as and without limitation the Example 1-3 formulations, or an PartA component of a dispensable gel formulation, such as and withoutlimitation the Example 3 formulation, is added to chamber 1202. The PartA component comprises a resin monomer, a resin crosslinking agent, acorrosion promoter, and a free radial initiator. In one embodiment, thePart A component is added in powder form and a sufficient amount ofwater is subsequently added to chamber 1202. In another embodiment, thePart A component is hydrated before being added to chamber 1202.

In these embodiments, a Part B component for either the sprayable ordispensable gel formulations is added to chamber 1204. The Part Bcomponent comprises a polymerization initiator. In one embodiment, thePart B component is added in powder form and a sufficient amount ofwater is subsequently added to chamber 1204. In another embodiment, thePart B component is hydrated before being added to chamber 1204.

The contents of chamber 1202 and chamber 1204 are directed into chamber1206. This can occur by a pumping means or physical mixing. Chamber 1206allows polymerization of the mixture to commence. The mixed contents ofchamber 1206 are subsequently directed outwardly through a nozzle, aspray head, or an aerator, depending on whether Applicant's compositionis dispensable, sprayable, or foamable, respectively, and onto thetarget.

Referring to FIG. 13, a block diagram 1300 represents an applicator todispense the Table 4 formulation. The first four listed components ofthe Table 5 formulation (NaCl, Methyldiethanol amine, MAFO CAB CGBetaine, Sodium Persulfate) are combined and added to chamber 1302 toform a Part A mixture. In one embodiment, water is added to hydrate themixture. In another embodiment, the mixture is hydrated before beingadded to chamber 1302. In one embodiment, a force is applied to thehydrated mixture in chamber 1302, though a pumping means or thoughdirect pressure, to force the mixture though an aeration nozzle 1304.

Referring to FIG. 14, a flowchart 1400 shows an exemplary embodiment ofa method to create and use the disarmament resin. A resin monomer, aresin crosslinking agent, a corrosion promoter, a free radial promoter,and a resin solvent are provided at step 1402. In one embodiment, theresin monomer is AMPS 2405, the resin crosslinking agent is N-N′methylenebisacrylamide, the corrosion promoter is calcium chloride, thefree radial promoter is sodium thiosulfate, and the resin solvent iswater. In another embodiment, the resin monomer ismelamine-glyoxal-acrylamide, the corrosion promoter is calcium chloride,the free radial promoter is sodium thiosulfate, and the resin solvent iswater.

The resin monomer, resin crosslinking agent, corrosion promoter, andfree radial promoter are combined at 1404 to create a powdered mixture.The resin solvent is added to the mixture at step 1406. The mixture isdissolved in the resin solvent to form Precursor A.

A polymerization initiator and a resin solvent are provided at step1408. In one embodiment, the polymerization initiator is sodiumpersulfate and the resin solvent is water. The resin solvent is added tothe polymerization initiator at step 1410. The mixture is dissolved inthe resin solvent to form Precursor B.

The Precursor A and the Precursor B are mixed at step 1412.Polymerization begins immediately upon mixing as the polymerizationinitiator as the free radical promoter and polymerization initiatorinitiate a free radical polymerization of the resin monomer. In oneembodiment, mixing step 1412 may occur in an applicator device wherePrecursor A and Precursor B are forced into a common chamber. In anotherembodiment, mixing step 1412 may occur in a container by manualstirring. The mixture of Precursor A and Precursor B is applied to thetarget at step 1414. In one embodiment, the mixture is a sprayableliquid that is forced through a spray head and onto a target. In anotherembodiment, the target is a metal or composite material intended to bedegraded. In yet another embodiment, the mixture is a dispensable gelthat is forced through an applicator head and onto a target. In yetanother embodiment, the mixture is a foamable liquid that is forcedthrough an applicator head and onto a target. The method ends at step1416.

Referring to FIG. 17, a pneumatic/hydraulic schematic 1700 of oneembodiment of an applicator for dispensing Applicant's sprayablecomposition is shown. This embodiment is particularly useful for abackpack-sized applicator. A Part A tank 1702 is in fluid communicationwith a fill/cut-off valve 1704, a mechanically operated toggle switch1706, and a pressure relief valve 1708. The mechanically operated toggleswitch 1706 is in fluid communication with a check valve 1710, which isin fluid communication with a first static mixing chamber 1712. The PartA tank 1702 contains an aqueous Part A solution. The Part B tank 1716contains an aqueous Part B solution.

A Part B tank 1716 is in fluid communication with a fill/cut-off valve1722, a mechanically operated toggle switch 1718, and a pressure reliefvalve 1724. The mechanically operated toggle switch 1718 is in fluidcommunication with a check valve 1720, which is in fluid communicationwith a first static mixing chamber 1712.

The first static mixing chamber 1712 is in fluid communication with asecond static mixing chamber 1714. The static mixing chambers 1712 and1714 ensure thorough mixing of the Part A and Part B components beforebeing broadcast from nozzle 1726. In one embodiment, the second mixingchamber 1714 is omitted and a single mixing chamber 1712 is used.

A source of compressed gas 1728 is in fluid communication with a cut-offvalve 1730. In one embodiment, the source of compressed gas 1728 is acompressed air tank containing 48 cubic inches of 3000 psi compressedair. The cut-off value 1730 is in fluid communication with a firstpressure regulator 1732. In one embodiment, the first pressure regulator1732 reduces the pressure from the source of 3000 psi to 100 psi at theoutlet of the first pressure regulator 1732. The first pressureregulator 1732 is in fluid communication with a second pressureregulator 1734. In one embodiment, the second pressure regulator 1734reduces the pressure from the 100 psi to 70 psi at the outlet of thesecond pressure regulator 1734. The second pressure regulator 1734 is influid communication with a third pressure regulator 1736. In oneembodiment, the third pressure regulator 1736 reduces the pressure fromthe 70 psi to 43 psi at the outlet of the third pressure regulator 1736.

The outlet of the second pressure regulator 1734, at a pressure in oneembodiment of 70 psi, is in fluid communication with a manually operatedvalve 1738 and a solenoid operated valve 1740. The manually operatedvalve 1738 and a solenoid operated valve 1740 are each in fluidcommunication with both lines entering the first static mixing chamber1712.

During operation, the valves 1706 and 1718 are opened, allowing theliquid contents of the Part A tank 1702 and the Part B tank 1716 to flowto the first static mixing chamber 1712. The contents of the Part A tank1702 and the Part B tank 1716 are forced under pressure (about 45 psi,in one embodiment) from the source of compressed gas 1728. The Part Aand Part B components are volumetrically mixed in the first staticmixing chamber 1712 and further mixed in the second static mixingchamber 1714 before existing the system under pressure at 1726.

Once the valves 1706 and 1718 are closed, stopping the flow of the PartA and Part B components through the static mixing chambers 1712 and1714, the solenoid value 1740 is electronically triggered allowing aflow of high pressure gas (about 70 psi, in one embodiment) to flush thestatic mixing heads 1712 and 1714 and the outlet nozzle 1726. The flushcan also be manually triggered by the manually operated valve 1738.

In one embodiment, all materials wetted in the system before the mixingof the Part A and Part B components (i.e., upstream from the firstmixing chamber 1712, are constructed from polypropylene, nylon 6, highdensity polyethylene, PVC, PFA or 316 L stainless steel. All componentswetted at or after the mixing of the Part A and Part B components areconstructed from non-metallic materials.

Referring to FIG. 18, one embodiment of an electrical schematic 1800 forthe system presented in FIG. 17 is shown. As will be appreciated by onehaving ordinary skill in the art, the electrical schematic 1800 is astandard electrical schematic containing standard electronic components.

Referring to FIG. 19, a pneumatic/hydraulic schematic 1900 of anotherembodiment of an applicator for dispensing Applicant's sprayablecomposition is shown. This embodiment is particularly useful for avehicle-mounted applicator.

A Part A reservoir 1902 is in fluid communication with a displacementpump 1904. The outlet of the displacement pump 1904 is in fluidcommunication with pressure relief valve 1906 and liquid pressureregulator valve 1908. The pressure relief value 1906 is in fluidcommunication with the Part A reservoir 1902. The liquid pressureregulator valve 1908 is in fluid communication with a needle valve 1910.The needle value 1910 is in fluid communication with a solenoid operatedvalve 1912. The solenoid operated value 1912 is in fluid communicationwith a check valve 1914. The check valve 1914 is in fluid communicationwith a first static mixing chamber 1916.

A Part B reservoir 1918 is in fluid communication with a displacementpump 1920. The outlet of the displacement pump 1904 is in fluidcommunication with pressure relief valve 1922 and liquid pressureregulator valve 1924. The pressure relief value 1922 is in fluidcommunication with the Part B reservoir 1918. The liquid pressureregulator valve 1924 is in fluid communication with a needle valve 1926.The needle value 1926 is in fluid communication with a solenoid operatedvalve 1928. The solenoid operated value 1928 is in fluid communicationwith a check valve 1930. The check valve 1930 is in fluid communicationwith a first with a first static mixing chamber 1916.

A source of compressed gas 1940 is in fluid communication with anadjustable gas pressure regulator valve 1942. In one embodiment, thesource of compressed gas 1940 is a gas-powered air compressor providingcompressed air at 70 psi. The adjustable gas pressure regulator valve1942 is in fluid communication with a check valve 1944. The check valve1944 is in fluid communication with the first static mixing chamber1934.

The first static mixing chamber 1916 is in fluid communication with asecond static mixing chamber 1932. The static mixing chambers 1916 and1932 ensure thorough mixing of the Part A and Part B components beforebeing broadcast from nozzle 1934. In one embodiment, the second mixingchamber 1932 is omitted and a single mixing chamber 1916 is used.

During operation of a system implementing the schematic 1900, the pump1904 drives aqueous Part A solution from the Part A reservoir 1902 intothe first static mixing chamber 1916 once the valve 1912 is activatedLikewise, the pump 1920 drives the aqueous Part B solution from the PartB reservoir 1918 into the first static mixing chamber 1916 once thevalve 1912 is activated. In one embodiment, an electrical switch is usedto simultaneously activate valves 1912 and 1928. Once the valves 1912and 1928 are deactivated and closed, the regulator valve 1942 isactivated, allowing pressurized gas from the source of pressurized gas1940 to flow through the static mixing chambers 1916 and 1932. Thisflushes and clears the mixing chambers 1916 and 1932 and the outletnozzle 1934 of all residual Part A/Part B solution.

In one embodiment, all materials wetted in the system before the mixingof the Part A and Part B components (i.e., upstream from the firstmixing chamber 1916, are constructed from polypropylene, nylon 6, highdensity polyethylene, PVC, PFA or 316 L stainless steel. All componentswetted at or after the mixing of the Part A and Part B components areconstructed from non-metallic materials.

Referring to FIG. 20, one embodiment of an electrical schematic 2000 forthe system presented in FIG. 19 is shown. As will be appreciated by onehaving ordinary skill in the art, the electrical schematic 2000 is astandard electrical schematic containing standard electronic components.

While specific values have been recited for the various embodimentsrecited herein, it is to be understood that, within the scope of theinvention, the values of all parameters, including amounts and ratios,may vary over wide ranges to suit different applications.

While the invention is described through the above-described exemplaryembodiments, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the artthat modifications to, and variations of, the illustrated embodimentsmay be made without departing from the inventive concepts disclosedherein. For example, although some aspects have been described withreference to a flowchart, those skilled in the art should readilyappreciate that functions, operations, decisions, etc. of all or aportion of each block, or a combination of blocks, of the flowchart maybe combined, separated into separate operations or performed in otherorders. In addition, although a composition for promoting theaccelerated degradation has been described in relation to small arms,electronics, and vehicles, the disclosed methods and formulations may beused for other purposes, including the production of hydrogen for usein, for example, fuel cells. Similarly, although a system and method forapplying Applicant's composition has been described, the disclosedsystem and method may be used for other purposes. Furthermore, disclosedaspects, or portions of these aspects, may be combined in ways notlisted above. Accordingly, the invention should not be viewed as beinglimited to the disclosed embodiment(s).

What is claimed is:
 1. A foaming composition to render electricalcomponents inoperable, comprising: a foaming agent; a corrosionpromoter; and a quantity of sodium persulfate.
 2. The composition ofclaim 1, wherein: the foaming agent comprises cocamidopropyl betaine;and the corrosion promoter comprises sodium chloride and methyldiethanolamine.
 3. The composition of claim 2, wherein: the sodium chloride atbetween about 18 dry weight percent to about 30 dry weight percent ofthe composition of claim 2; the methyldiethanol amine at between about15 dry weight percent to about 30 dry weight percent of the compositionof claim 2; the cocamidopropyl betaine at between about 10 dry weightpercent to about 20 dry weight percent of the composition of claim 2;and the quantity of sodium persulfate at between about 35 dry weightpercent to about 45 dry weight percent of the composition of claim
 2. 4.The composition of claim 3, further comprising water at about 50-75weight percent of an aqueous mixture.
 5. The foaming composition ofclaim 1, wherein: the foaming agent comprises a surfactant selected fromthe group consisting of schercotain scab-50 betaine amphoteric,chembetain cas, and chembetaine 1 hs; and the corrosion promotercomprises sodium chloride and a component selected from the groupconsisting of methyldiethanol amine and sodium thiosulfate.
 6. A methodto render a firearm inoperable, comprising: combining a first componentwith water to create a first aqueous mixture, wherein the firstcomponent comprises: a polymerizable compound; a corrosion promoter; andsulfur-containing compound to poison the recombination of atomichydrogen to molecular hydrogen; and combining a second component withwater to create a second aqueous mixture, wherein the second componentcomprises a free radical polymerization agent; combining the firstaqueous mixture with the second aqueous mixture to create a reactionmixture; and disposing the reaction mixture on the firearm.
 7. Themethod of claim 6, further comprising polymerizing said monomer to forma polymeric coating on part or all of said firearm.
 8. The method ofclaim 7, further comprising: generating atomic hydrogen; and embrittlingmetallic portions of said firearm with said atomic hydrogen.
 9. Themethod of claim 7, further comprising corroding metallic portions ofsaid firearm.
 10. The method of claim 6, wherein said disposingcomprises spraying.
 11. The method of claim 6, wherein saidpolymerizable component comprises a foaming agent.